Tuesday, November 16, 2010

Hepl With Disability In Michigan

Right and Left

apparently banal and flat, the TV show last night saw two people on the consistency even more scarce and questionable acting skills list verbatim, sometimes running out in the meeting, those who should be the values \u200b\u200bof right and left. The show was considered by many to be pedantic, superficial, boring, old, inappropriate, didactic. " The thing that is puzzling is that the right and left are now old and dying historical categories," says Aldo Grasso peremptory from the columns in the Corriere della Sera. On the other hand, already Gaber was fun to make fun on some time ago. Yet something happened last night is different, as if she had rekindled a standstill for over fifteen years.




Right and Left are interpretative categories of political attitudes, have become old in recent years simply because the policy had ceased to apply! But for voters was only too evident that in a democratic country is a difference between the factions in the field there and there should be.
With the end of the 80s have seen the first fall of the Berlin Wall, then Tangentopoli, finally entering the Italian Parliament of characters proudly non-political (by entrepreneurs, judges, people to the show). The icing on the cake was the reshuffle of new parties with old players, that has confused even more ideas. The landscape that was forming in front of the voter was a lot of confusion between a party and each other.
Over time the framework has stabilized on this confusion. I remember that even in the early 2000s trying to understand what the word reformist that seemed one of those words that immediately comes the night and invades the papers: a word-fungus, so to speak! Well, I found that was a word that indicated a moderate left, with the opposite meaning to the word revolutionary , referring instead to the extreme left. Basically if the first accepted the system suggesting changes to the other the problem was the system itself, which was redesigned from the ground up. Then I pacificai, but not for long. In short, in fact, I realized that there was a fraud background and began questioning me about the meaning of the words reform, revolution, but above system: Is there really a alternative system in the name of reform which or revolutionize the existing one? The answer in those days was not confused! Was there any possible mitigating factor of a system focused on unbridled capitalism and the profit at all costs, but no longer existed, or even a substantial alternative (that I only understood years later, chatting in the car on the road to Tivoli!).
So here also the ideals that suddenly were reduced to ideas (see the success of League) and the names of parties receiving general tone and rather insignificant, as Forza Italy, Italy of Values \u200b\u200b , National Alliance until Margaret, Rosa nel Pugno and several others. Has anyone tried to remain anchored to some ideological reference ( Democratic Party, Communist PRC , Radicals , Republicans ...) with more disappointing results in terms of party identity. In the end, for some, the reference identity is once again the position in the classroom: Left Ecology and Freedom left Union Center the center, The Right right. Then it was so strange that someone sooner or later you were to ask what the hell were the values \u200b\u200bof these identities?
Beyond the personal assessments on the show aired last night, the impression is that, in the twilight era of politics, we're finally stopping to think about what could be the engines of a new season. Since the early 90's talking about the Second Republic (forgetting that the transition should be marked by a new Constituent Assembly), but it is clear that the former has never faded completely, and that the supposed second is actually a transition from Old to New . With an excess of hope, perhaps you might think that someone wants to lay the foundations, starting from the reference values \u200b\u200bof the respective sides. Whether it is Right and Left is secondary, maybe they are really labels to be scrapped, the new fact is that the lists really brought different values, complementary, a possible reference for political projects. If it will be a new beginning will have to demonstrate in practice those which have nominated them, although already witnessed numerous inconsistencies policies, which we ask to bring forward a coherent and convincing than that proclaimed in front of 9 million people.

0 comments:

Post a Comment